Volume 1, Issue 2 (12-2024)
SELMJ 2024, 1(2): 121-154 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghanbaryan F. (2024). Rereading the Discourse of Educational Leadership in the Palgrave Collection (1). SELMJ. 1(2), 121-154.
URL: http://selmj.ir/article-1-51-en.html
URL: http://selmj.ir/article-1-51-en.html
Farhangian University, Iran
Abstract: (293 Views)
The present article adopts an interpretive and critical approach to examine the educational leadership perspective and its discourses as presented in The Palgrave International Handbook of Educational Leadership Discourses, edited by Fenwick W. English. This book is considered one of the prominent and comprehensive resources in the field of educational leadership and management studies. It explores the concepts and foundations of educational leadership as a form of discourse through a multidimensional and critical lens. Specifically, the book focuses on the role of metaphors, narratives, and critical discourses in shaping leadership theories and practices. It strives to provide a comprehensive picture of the complexities of educational leadership in today's world, making a significant contribution to deepening the understanding of leadership and enhancing related discourses within the field of educational leadership studies
Keywords: Palgrave Collection, Educational Leadership Perspectives, Educational Leadership Discourse, Fenwick W. English
References
1. Anthias, F. (2013). Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality and levels of analysis. Ethnicities, 13(1), 3-19. [DOI:10.1177/1468796812463547]
2. Anderson, G. L., Cohen, M. I., & Seraus, M. (2015). Urban leadership, neoliberalism, and new policy entrepreneurs. In M. Khalifa, N. W. Arnold, A. F. Osanloo, & C. M. Grant (Eds.), Handbook of urban educational leadership (pp. 350-361). Rowman & Littlefield.
3. Anderson, G., & Cohen, M. (2015). Redesigning the identities of teachers and leaders: A framework for studying new professionalism and educator resistance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 85. [DOI:10.14507/epaa.v23.2086]
4. Asuga, G. N., Scevak, J., & Eacott, S. (2016). Educational leadership, management and administration in Africa: An analysis of contemporary literature. School Leadership & Management, 36(4), 381-400. [DOI:10.1080/13632434.2016.1247042]
5. Apple, M. W. (1993). The politics of official knowledge: Does a national curriculum make sense? Teachers College Record, 95(2), 222-241. [DOI:10.1177/016146819309500206]
6. Bates, R. J. (2010). History of educational leadership and management. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGraw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 724-730). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00412-7]
7. Boulton, G., & Lucas, C. (2011). What are universities for? Chinese Science Bulletin, 56(23), 2506-2517. [DOI:10.1007/s11434-011-4608-7]
8. Binkley, S. (2009). The work of neoliberal governmentality: Temporality and ethical substance in the tale of two dads. Foucault Studies, 6, 60-78. [DOI:10.22439/fs.v0i0.2472]
9. Bilge, S. (2013). Intersectionality undone: Saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10, 405-424. [DOI:10.1017/S1742058X13000283]
10. Biddle, C., & Azano, A. P. (2016). Constructing and reconstructing the "rural school problem" A century of rural education research. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 298-325. [DOI:10.3102/0091732X16667700]
11. Beadie, N. (2008). Toward a history of education markets in the United States: An introduction. Social Science History, 32(1), 47-73.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0145553200013924 [DOI:10.1017/S0145553200013924.]
12. Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1-20). [DOI:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142]
13. Carbado, D. W. (2013). Colorblind intersectionality. Signs, 38(4), 13-19. Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785-810. [DOI:10.1086/669666]
14. Clarke, J., Bainton, D., Lendvai, N., & Stubbs, P. (2015). Making policy move: Towards a politics of translation and assemblage. Bristol, UK: Policy Press. [DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781447313366.001.0001]
15. Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299. [DOI:10.2307/1229039]
16. De Lissovoy, N. (2015). Education and emancipation in the neoliberal era: Being, teaching, and power. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. [DOI:10.1057/9781137375315]
17. Deleuze, G. (1992).What is a dispositif? In Michel Foucault: Philosopher (pp. 159-168). Paris: Seuil. Dolan, C. (2020). Paradox and the school leader: The struggle for the soul of the principal in neoliberal times. Singapore: Springer Nature.
18. Duong, K. (2012). What does queer theory teach us about intersectionality? Politics and Gender, 8, 370-386. [DOI:10.1017/S1743923X12000360]
19. Longmuir, F. (2019). Resistant leadership: Countering dominant paradigms in school improvement. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 51(3), 256-272. [DOI:10.1080/00220620.2019.1583172]
20. Eacott, S. (2015). Problematizing the intellectual gaze of the educational administration scholar. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 312-329. [DOI:10.1080/00131857.2014.976926]
21. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599. [DOI:10.2307/3178066]
22. Foucault, M. (1980). Confessions of the flesh. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (pp. 194-228). New York, NY: Pantheon.
23. Grzanka, P. R. (2014). Intersectionality: A foundations and frontiers reader. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
24. Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism's war on higher education. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books. Gutek, G. L. (1970). An historical introduction to American education. New York, NY: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
25. Maesse, J. (2017). The elitism dispositif: Hierarchization, discourses of excellence and organizational change in European economics. Higher Education, 73(6), 909-927. [DOI:10.1007/s10734-016-0019-7]
26. Legg, S. (2011). Assemblage/apparatus: Using Deleuze and Foucault. Area, 43(2), 128-133. [DOI:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01010.x]
27. Jackson, N., & Carter, P. (1998). Labour as dressage. In A. McKinlay & K. Starkey (Eds.), Foucault, management and organization theory (pp. 49-64). London, UK: SAGE. [DOI:10.4135/9781446221686.n4]
28. Loveday, V. (2021). Under attack: Responsibility, crisis, and survival anxiety amongst manageracademics in UK universities. The Sociological Review, 69(5), 903-919.
1177/0038026121999209 [DOI:10.]
29. Lykke, N. (2005). Intersectionality revisited: Problems and potentials. Kvinnovetenskaplig tidskrift, 2(3), 7-17
30. McClure, K. R., Barringer, S. N., & Brown, J. T. (2020). Privatization as the new normal in higher education. In L. W. Perna (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 35, pp. 589-666). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-31365-4_13]
31. Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. [DOI:10.1515/9780822384649]
32. Moradi, B. (2016). (Re)focusing intersectionality: From social identities back to systems of oppression and privilege. In K. A. DeBoard, A. R. Fischer, K. J. Bieschke, & R. M. Perez (Eds.), Handbook of sexual orientation and gender diversity in counseling and psychotherapy (3rd ed., pp. 105-127). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. [DOI:10.1037/15959-005]
33. Staunæs, D. (2003). Where have all the subjects gone? Bringing together the concepts of intersectionality and subjectification. Nora, 11(2), 101-110. [DOI:10.1080/08038740310002950]
34. Staunæs, D. (2003). Where have all the subjects gone? Bringing together the concepts of intersectionality and subjectification. Nora, 11(2), 101-110. [DOI:10.1080/08038740310002950]
35. Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. London: Sage. [DOI:10.4135/9781446251041]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
